World-Class Owner’s Engineering, EPC and O&M for Gas Turbine Projects in North America: The USP&E Global Advantage
North America is, by every meaningful measure, the world’s most consequential gas turbine power market of the next decade. The United States alone will add an estimated 60–90 GW of new gas turbine capacity between 2025 and 2030, driven by AI data center load, industrial reshoring, coal plant retirement, and grid reliability imperatives. Canada and Mexico are adding meaningful incremental capacity for LNG terminals, mining, and industrial electrification. Across PJM, ERCOT, MISO, SPP, WECC, IESO (Ontario), CENACE (Mexico), and the California ISO, the same constraint presents itself over and over: grid interconnection queues are oversubscribed by 3–7 years, and owners need world-class gas turbine EPC and O&M in North America to deliver dispatchable megawatts on schedules the grid cannot match.
USP&E Global brings a distinct capability to this market. Founded in 2002 and headquartered with a primary U.S. presence in Knoxville, Tennessee, USP&E is a U.S.-shareholder-owned, FCPA-compliant EPC and O&M firm with offices in the United States, the United Arab Emirates, South Africa, and Mali. The company has delivered 150+ projects in 35+ countries, holds formal partner letters from GE Power & Water and Siemens Energy, is ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018 certified, controls over 600 MW of gas turbine inventory (including trailer-mounted TM2500 units that can deploy to North American sites in weeks), and has active or recent engagements in the USA, Guyana, Colombia, and Mexico — documented at the Americas EPC & O&M portfolio page.
This article is written for the utility director, IPP developer, hyperscale data center acquisition lead, or private-equity-backed AI infrastructure CFO who needs world-class gas turbine owner’s engineer USA, EPC, and O&M services — and who is racing a grid queue to commercial operation. Your North American project is the hero. USP&E is the guide.
The North American Gas Turbine Power Landscape: What the Data Shows
North American electricity demand is growing faster than it has in more than two decades. The U.S. Energy Information Administration Short-Term Energy Outlook reports that U.S. electricity generation continues to expand, with natural gas remaining the largest single fuel source. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and independent system operators including PJM Interconnection and ERCOT all report that new generation queues are dominated by gas, solar, and storage — with gas turbine capacity additions accelerating in response to data center load. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) has formally flagged resource adequacy concerns in multiple sub-regions through 2029.
Mexico’s gas turbine demand is similarly growing. CENACE and SENER planning documents project continued gas turbine additions to support industrial growth in Monterrey, Querétaro, and the Yucatán, while new LNG export projects in Baja California require captive gas turbine generation. Canada’s gas turbine additions are concentrated in Alberta and Ontario — supporting oil sands electrification, LNG export, and data center development.
| Market / ISO | Estimated 2025–2030 Gas Turbine Additions | Primary Driver | Interconnection Queue Status | USP&E Engagement Status |
| PJM (Eastern US) | 15–25 GW | Data centers (VA, OH, PA), peaker retirement | Oversubscribed — multi-year queue | Active engagements |
| ERCOT (Texas) | 20–30 GW | Data centers, LNG, industrial, weather resilience | Oversubscribed — 3–5 yr queue | Active engagements |
| MISO (Midwest) | 8–12 GW | Manufacturing reshoring, peaker retirement | Oversubscribed — 4+ yr queue | Pipeline development |
| SPP / WECC | 5–10 GW | Industrial, mining, data center | Oversubscribed | Pipeline development |
| California ISO | 3–6 GW | Reliability, peaker replacement | Constrained — permitting challenges | Advisory only |
| IESO (Ontario) | 3–5 GW | Reliability, data center, industrial | Growing queue | Pipeline development |
| CENACE (Mexico) | 5–10 GW | Industrial, LNG, data center | Growing queue | Active engagements |
The implication for any developer planning capacity in this window is unambiguous: a world-class gas turbine EPC and O&M in North America partner — one who can execute owner’s engineering, full turnkey EPC, and long-term operations under a single accountability structure — is the scarce resource.
Key Drivers of Gas Turbine Owner’s Engineering, EPC and O&M in North America
Six structural forces define the North American gas turbine opportunity through 2030.
- AI Data Center Load in PJM and ERCOT. Announced AI data center developments in Virginia, Texas, Arizona, Georgia, and Ohio exceed 30 GW of near-term load. Most developers are now evaluating behind-the-meter gas turbine generation as the only credible path to in-service dates. See USP&E’s data center gas turbine platform.
- Industrial Reshoring and Mega-Factories. Semiconductor fabs (Arizona, Texas, Ohio), EV battery gigafactories (Tennessee, Kentucky, Georgia, Michigan), and steel/aluminum capacity expansions are each creating 200–1,000 MW captive power opportunities.
- Coal and Older CCGT Retirement. Roughly 50+ GW of coal and aging gas turbine capacity is scheduled for retirement across North America through 2030, creating direct replacement and peaker opportunities.
- LNG Export Build-Out.S. Gulf Coast LNG capacity continues expanding, with each LNG train requiring 100–400 MW of captive gas turbine generation.
- Weather Resilience and Grid Reliability. Following winter and summer reliability events in Texas, California, and the Northeast, regulators and utilities are increasing capacity margin requirements — driving peaker gas turbine procurement.
- Mexican Industrial and LNG Growth. Nearshoring of industrial production into Mexico is adding 5–10 GW of captive and industrial gas turbine demand through 2030, particularly in northern Mexico and the Yucatán.
| Service Offering | Typical Scope | Typical Engagement Duration | Owner Benefit |
| Owner’s Engineer (OE) | Spec development, bid evaluation, construction oversight, commissioning QA | 24–48 months project cycle | Independent technical oversight; no conflict with EPC |
| Turnkey LSTK EPC | Full engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning — price and date certain | 18–42 months | Single-point accountability; bankable |
| EPCM / Construction Management | Engineering + managed procurement + construction supervision | 18–42 months | Owner retains procurement flexibility |
| Long-Term O&M | Operations, scheduled/unscheduled maintenance, spares, performance reporting | 5–15 years | Availability guarantees; fleet-wide optimization |
| Fast-Track Bridge Power | Mobile TM2500 aeroderivative deployment while permanent plant builds | 3–9 months | Bridges grid queue or PPA gap |
USP&E’s North American Gas Turbine Capability: Owner’s Engineering, EPC, and O&M
USP&E delivers three integrated services across North American gas turbine projects — and the combination is what clients describe as world-class. Each service is available standalone or integrated under a single master agreement.
1. Gas Turbine Owner’s Engineer (OE) Services
As gas turbine owner’s engineer USA, USP&E provides independent technical oversight for utility, IPP, data center, and industrial owners who prefer to contract directly with OEMs (GE Vernova, Siemens Energy, Mitsubishi Power, Solar Turbines) and their own construction teams. OE scope typically includes: basis-of-design and specification development, pre-FEED and FEED technical oversight, OEM bid evaluation, EPC bid evaluation, technical due diligence, construction monitoring, commissioning QA, performance test witnessing, and 6–12 month post-COD reliability monitoring. OE engagements typically run 24–48 months. USP&E’s 350+ engineers provide deep OE bench strength across mechanical, electrical, civil, controls, and commissioning.
2. Turnkey Gas Turbine EPC
USP&E delivers full lump-sum turnkey (LSTK) and cost-plus gas turbine EPC across aeroderivative and industrial platforms: GE TM2500 (30 MW trailer-mounted), GE LM2500/LM6000 (20–60 MW aeroderivative), GE Frame 7E/7F (125–400 MW industrial), Siemens SGT-A65 (45 MW aeroderivative), Siemens SGT-800 (57 MW industrial), Siemens SGT-8000H (400+ MW combined-cycle), and Solar Titan/Mars packages (10–40 MW). EPC scope includes engineering, procurement, civil construction, mechanical and electrical installation, grid interconnection, and commissioning to commercial operation. See our EPC construction capability.
3. Long-Term Gas Turbine O&M
USP&E offers multi-decade natural gas turbine O&M USA agreements with availability guarantees of 95–97% on aeroderivative platforms and 92–95% on heavy-duty industrial and combined-cycle platforms. O&M scope includes: 24/7 operations staffing, scheduled maintenance (combustor inspection, hot gas path inspection, major overhaul), unscheduled repair, spares management, lube oil and consumables, fuel quality monitoring, performance analytics via SmartPower, NERC CIP cybersecurity compliance, environmental compliance, and annual performance reporting. Review operations and maintenance and the SmartPower platform.
North American Regulatory and Grid Interface Engineering
Every North American gas turbine project must navigate a complex regulatory and grid-interface stack. USP&E’s engineering discipline covers each layer:
- Federal environmental permitting — EPA New Source Review (NSR), Title V operating permits, PSD analysis, and Clean Air Act Section 111 compliance (including the 2024 GHG rule framework).
- State environmental permitting — Varies by state; USP&E engages directly with regulators in TX (TCEQ), VA (DEQ), OH (EPA), PA (DEP), and others.
- Grid interconnection — PJM, ERCOT, MISO, SPP, WECC interconnection studies, system impact studies, facilities studies, and NERC reliability compliance.
- FERC jurisdictional interface — Where applicable, Order 2023 interconnection reform compliance, tariff interface, and NERC Reliability Standards.
- Natural gas pipeline tap and interstate interface — FERC Section 7 applications, pipeline operator interface (Enterprise, Kinder Morgan, Williams, Enbridge, TransCanada).
- Cybersecurity — NERC CIP v6/v7 compliance for BES cyber assets, critical cyber asset identification, personnel training, access management.
| North American Project Type | Typical Schedule to COD | Indicative CapEx (USD/kW) | USP&E Service Mix | Key Regulatory Interface |
| Behind-the-meter data center (simple cycle) | 12–18 months | $700–$1,100 | EPC + O&M + OE | State air permit, local zoning, gas interconnect |
| Behind-the-meter data center (combined cycle) | 24–36 months | $900–$1,400 | EPC + O&M + OE | EPA NSR, state air, gas interconnect |
| Utility peaker (50–300 MW) | 24–36 months | $750–$1,100 | EPC + O&M or OE | PJM/ERCOT interconnect, NERC, state air |
| Combined-cycle utility IPP (300–800 MW) | 36–48 months | $900–$1,400 | EPC + LTSA or OE + Adv | FERC, ISO, EPA NSR, NERC CIP |
| LNG export captive power (100–400 MW) | 30–42 months | $1,000–$1,500 | EPC + O&M | FERC LNG, DOT pipeline safety, state air |
| Mexican industrial captive (50–300 MW) | 24–36 months | $800–$1,200 | EPC + O&M | CENACE interconnect, SEMARNAT, CRE |
Fast-Track TM2500 Bridge Power for North American Data Centers
For North American data center developers who cannot accept a 24–36 month schedule, USP&E offers fast-track behind-the-meter gas turbine bridge power using its GE TM2500 fleet. TM2500 units are 30 MW each, trailer-mounted, factory-new or low-hour, and can be deployed to a prepared site in 3–6 months. USP&E has executed 12 × TM2500 deployments totaling USD 250M+ in a single transaction. Browse our current natural gas turbine listings.
Case Studies: USP&E’s North American and Americas Gas Turbine Track Record
Case 1: Active North American Data Center Gas Turbine Engagements
USP&E is actively engaged with multiple hyperscale and colocation data center developers in PJM and ERCOT on behind-the-meter gas turbine programs ranging from 30 MW to 500+ MW. Under NDA, USP&E provides owner’s engineering, technical due diligence, turbine procurement strategy, EPC scoping, and long-term O&M structuring. The AI Revolution gas turbine platform page summarizes public-facing positioning.
Case 2: Siemens SGT Gas Turbine — USD 10 Million Saved
USP&E executed technical due diligence and procurement strategy for a Siemens SGT-series gas turbine transaction — delivering over USD 10 million in savings versus alternative OEM-direct pathways. Full case published at USP&E’s Siemens SGT-400 case study. The same procurement discipline now serves North American data center and industrial gas turbine acquisitions.
Case 3: Americas Multi-Country EPC and O&M Portfolio
USP&E has executed or is executing gas turbine and engine-driven power station projects across the Americas: 16 MW HFO plant in Guatemala (PEMEX); Pacific Rim 5 MW diesel EPC in Panama; Carnival Cruise Lines 16 MW EPC and O&M across international ports (including U.S. ports); active engagements in Mexico and Guyana. Details at the Guyana, Colombia, Mexico, USA power plant EPC & O&M article and the broader project experience portfolio and client references.
How to Select the Right Gas Turbine EPC and O&M Partner for North America: 10 Critical Criteria
- S. FCPA and OFAC Compliance. Your EPC partner must have documented U.S. compliance programs. USP&E is U.S.-shareholder-owned and operates under strict FCPA and OFAC frameworks.
- ISO 9001 and ISO 45001 Certification. Non-negotiable for project finance and major utility contracts. Request actual certificates.
- Zero Lawsuit History. For major North American project commitments, your EPC’s litigation history is material. USP&E has zero lawsuits in 25 years.
- PJM / ERCOT / MISO Interconnection Experience. Your EPC must have engineered gas turbine interconnections in the specific ISO where your project sits.
- EPA New Source Review Experience. For U.S. projects, your EPC must have delivered Clean Air Act major source air permitting and SCR/CO catalyst integration.
- NERC CIP Capability. For BES cyber asset projects, NERC CIP compliance is mandatory. Ask specifically about your EPC’s CIP v6/v7 track record.
- OEM Direct Partner Letters. Ask for written partner letters from GE Vernova and Siemens Energy. USP&E holds both.
- Inventory and OEM Slot Position. In a supply-constrained market, inventory wins. USP&E controls 600+ MW of gas turbine inventory globally, with U.S.-deployable TM2500 assets.
- Written Availability Guarantees in O&M. Non-negotiable for data center and utility projects. USP&E offers 95–97% on aeroderivatives, 92–95% on heavy-duty industrial.
- Owner’s Engineer and EPC Capability Under One Roof. Few firms can credibly offer both independent OE and turnkey EPC. USP&E can — and will contractually separate them when owners require it.
Frequently Asked Questions: Gas Turbine EPC and O&M in North America
Does USP&E execute gas turbine EPC projects in the United States?
Yes. USP&E is a U.S.-shareholder-owned EPC and O&M firm with primary U.S. presence in Knoxville, Tennessee, and is actively engaged on gas turbine projects in the PJM, ERCOT, and adjacent ISO markets. Engagements span owner’s engineering, turnkey EPC, fast-track TM2500 bridge power, and long-term O&M for utility, IPP, data center, and industrial clients. USP&E is fully FCPA and OFAC compliant and operates under ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018 certifications.
How fast can USP&E commission a gas turbine power station in North America?
USP&E can deploy GE TM2500 mobile gas turbine bridge power (30 MW per unit) to a prepared North American site in 3–6 months. Permanent simple-cycle aeroderivative plants can reach commercial operation in 12–18 months. Combined-cycle plants take 24–36 months. These timelines leverage USP&E’s 600+ MW of gas turbine inventory and direct OEM relationships, and compare favorably with 36–72+ month grid interconnection queue timelines in most ISOs.
What is a gas turbine owner’s engineer and why do I need one?
A gas turbine owner’s engineer USA provides independent technical oversight on behalf of the project owner — separate from the EPC contractor. OE scope typically includes specification development, bid evaluation, construction monitoring, commissioning quality assurance, and performance test witnessing. For any project above USD 100 million, an independent OE is standard practice and is often required by project lenders. USP&E offers OE services with 350+ engineers on staff across mechanical, electrical, civil, controls, and commissioning disciplines.
Does USP&E handle EPA Clean Air Act permitting for U.S. gas turbine projects?
USP&E’s engineering scope includes air emissions modeling, SCR and CO catalyst integration, and direct permit submission support under EPA New Source Review (NSR) and Title V frameworks. Where required, USP&E partners with licensed state-level permitting consultants to deliver the full permit package. Emissions engineering is built into every USP&E U.S. project from the feasibility stage — not bolted on later.
Can USP&E operate behind-the-meter gas turbine generation for a hyperscale data center?
Yes. USP&E provides long-term behind-the-meter gas turbine O&M for data center applications, with availability guarantees of 95–97% on aeroderivative platforms (LM6000, SGT-A65, TM2500). Scope includes 24/7 operations, scheduled maintenance coordinated around data center maintenance windows, spares stocking, and real-time performance monitoring via the SmartPower platform. Siemens Energy has formally recommended USP&E’s O&M capability in a signed reference letter.
Does USP&E work in Mexico and Canada as well as the United States?
Yes. USP&E has active engagements and project history across the Americas including the USA, Mexico, Guyana, Colombia, Panama, and Guatemala — documented at the Americas power plant EPC and O&M portfolio. Mexican projects interface with CENACE, SENER, and CRE regulatory frameworks. Canadian capability is available through USP&E’s U.S. operations.
What gas turbine platforms does USP&E work with in North America?
USP&E engineers, procures, commissions, and operates all major North American gas turbine platforms: GE TM2500, GE LM2500, GE LM6000, GE Frame 7E/7F, Siemens SGT-A65, Siemens SGT-800, Siemens SGT-8000H, and Solar Titan/Mars. The company holds formal partner letters from both GE Power & Water and Siemens Energy. Browse gas turbine inventory.
North American Grid Codes, Permitting, and Regulatory Compliance: What USP&E Engineers for Every Project
Gas turbine projects in North America operate under a regulatory architecture that is materially different from any other region where USP&E works. FERC, NERC, EPA, state PUCs, regional ISOs, and local jurisdictions each impose distinct requirements that cascade into engineering, procurement, and operations. A gas turbine owner’s engineer in North America must be fluent in all of these regimes — and must translate them into actionable engineering deliverables, procurement specifications, and O&M procedures.
USP&E’s North American engineering team maintains current expertise across the regulatory landscape that governs every utility-scale and industrial gas turbine project in the USA. The table below summarizes the primary regulatory touchpoints and USP&E’s engineering response.
| Regulatory Regime | Scope and Applicability | USP&E Engineering Response |
| FERC Order 2023 | Interconnection queue reform; cluster studies; readiness milestones | Queue position strategy; readiness deposits; interconnection feasibility studies |
| NERC Reliability Standards | Bulk electric system reliability; CIP cybersecurity; PRC protection standards | Protection coordination studies; CIP-compliant controls architecture; NERC-compliant commissioning |
| EPA NSPS / NESHAP | New Source Performance Standards for stationary combustion turbines; MACT for HAPs | DLN combustor selection; SCR/CO catalyst sizing; CEMS instrumentation; Title V permitting |
| PSD / NSR Permitting | Prevention of Significant Deterioration; New Source Review for major sources | BACT analysis; modeling; public participation; often 12–24 months to permit |
| State PUC | Siting, CPCN, rate recovery (for utility projects); interconnection study review | State-specific filing support; testimony; siting council coordination |
| Regional ISO (ERCOT, PJM, MISO, CAISO) | Market participation; dispatch rules; capacity market qualification | ISO-specific modeling; capacity qualification testing; market interface controls |
| Local / county | Zoning; building permits; noise ordinances; fire code (NFPA 850) | Local engineering partners; acoustic studies; fire protection design |
Each of these regulatory regimes imposes engineering requirements that must be embedded in the design — not bolted on after equipment procurement. USP&E’s owner’s engineering discipline is to front-load regulatory analysis during the feasibility and conceptual engineering phases, so that equipment specifications, site layout, and construction sequences are compliant by design rather than by retrofit.
The North American Gas Turbine O&M Landscape: Why Performance-Based Contracts Are Becoming the Standard
The traditional model for North American gas turbine O&M was cost-plus: the asset owner paid an hourly rate for technicians, plus markup on parts and consumables, with no contractual commitment to plant availability or heat rate. That model has been in structural decline for 15 years — and in the current market, sophisticated industrial and utility asset owners increasingly demand performance-based contracts where the O&M provider’s compensation is linked to actual plant performance.
USP&E has structured our gas turbine O&M USA offering around performance-based contracts from inception. Our availability guarantees, heat rate commitments, and liquidated damages structure align our commercial interest directly with our clients’ asset performance. The table below summarizes how USP&E’s performance-based O&M compares to traditional cost-plus and OEM LTSA alternatives.
| Contract Feature | Traditional Cost-Plus | OEM LTSA | USP&E Performance-Based |
| Availability guarantee | None | 88–94%, with conditions | 92–97%, with clear LDs |
| Heat rate commitment | None | Degradation curve | Written heat rate warranty |
| Parts pricing | Cost + markup | Fixed schedule, OEM only | OEM-approved alternates; competitive sourcing |
| Technician deployment | Hourly rate, client-directed | OEM rotation, limited | Resident team + expert surge |
| Remote monitoring | Client-provided | OEM proprietary | SmartPower + OEM data integration |
| Contract term | 1–3 years | 8–12 years | 5–10 years, with performance exits |
| Cost visibility | Variable, hard to predict | Predictable but premium | Fixed + performance bonus structure |
USP&E’s performance-based model is possible because we are not just an O&M contractor — we are an integrated engineering, EPC, and O&M company with 23 years of gas turbine operating data, formal OEM partnerships, and a global technical workforce that allows us to deploy resident teams and expert surge capability without the overhead cost structure of a pure-play OEM service organization.
For industrial and utility asset owners operating gas turbine power stations in North America, the financial case for performance-based O&M is compelling. A 2-point improvement in availability on a 100 MW plant can generate $3–6M in additional revenue annually, depending on market and capacity factor. A 1% improvement in heat rate saves $500K–$1.2M annually in fuel cost. These are the outcomes USP&E’s O&M is structured to deliver — and to guarantee.
This is not service. This is stewardship. And it is why USP&E’s North American owner’s engineering, EPC, and O&M practice continues to expand across data center prime power, industrial captive generation, and utility-scale gas turbine fleets.
North American Gas Turbine Case Studies: USP&E Execution in Context
USP&E’s North American gas turbine practice spans data center prime power, industrial captive generation, utility peaking, and independent power production. While many of our current engagements are confidential due to client and hyperscaler NDA requirements, several representative patterns from the practice illustrate the scope of what USP&E’s owner’s engineering, EPC, and O&M team delivers in the USA.
Pattern 1: Hyperscale AI Training Campus, ERCOT. A hyperscale sponsor approached USP&E requiring 300 MW of behind-the-meter prime power within 14 months. USP&E’s engineering team completed a bankable feasibility study in 45 days, secured TM2500 inventory to collapse procurement by 8 months, coordinated with the Texas PUC and ERCOT for islanded-to-grid transition, and delivered detailed engineering concurrent with long-lead procurement. The project illustrates USP&E’s gas turbine data center North America delivery model at its most aggressive.
Pattern 2: Industrial Captive Generation, Gulf Coast. A major petrochemical operator engaged USP&E as owner’s engineer for a 150 MW cogeneration retrofit, displacing utility purchases with on-site gas turbines plus HRSG and steam delivery to an existing process plant. USP&E’s natural gas turbine EPC North America scope included Title V permitting, NSR analysis, steam system integration, and a 10-year availability-guaranteed O&M contract. The project illustrates the cogeneration and process-steam integration capabilities that differentiate USP&E from pure-play power EPC firms.
Pattern 3: Utility Peaking Capacity, MISO. A rural electric cooperative engaged USP&E to evaluate and deploy 60 MW of fast-start peaking capacity to meet capacity market obligations. USP&E’s owner’s engineering team completed the capacity accreditation testing, coordinated with the MISO market operator, and structured a 7-year O&M agreement aligned with the cooperative’s rate recovery horizon. The project illustrates USP&E’s ability to serve small and mid-sized utilities that OEM service organizations typically deprioritize.
Each of these patterns — and dozens more across the USP&E USA portfolio — reflects the integration of engineering, procurement, construction, and operations that defines our world-class owner’s engineering, EPC, and O&M proposition. For industrial and utility clients considering gas turbine projects in North America, USP&E’s track record provides direct, verifiable evidence that the commitments in our proposals are backed by delivered outcomes.
Summary: Key Takeaways for North American Gas Turbine Decision-Makers
- North America will add 60–90 GW of new gas turbine capacity between 2025 and 2030 — making gas turbine EPC and O&M in North America the single largest thermal opportunity in the world.
- Grid interconnection queues in PJM, ERCOT, MISO, and SPP are oversubscribed by 3–7 years, forcing developers to build behind-the-meter gas turbine generation on-site.
- USP&E is a U.S.-shareholder-owned, FCPA and OFAC compliant EPC and O&M firm with ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018 certifications and zero lawsuits in 25 years.
- USP&E offers owner’s engineering, turnkey EPC, fast-track TM2500 bridge power, and long-term O&M under a single accountability structure.
- Written availability guarantees of 95–97% on aeroderivatives and 92–95% on heavy-duty industrial platforms.
- USP&E holds formal partner letters from GE Power & Water and Siemens Energy, and has executed USD 250M+ transactions in a single TM2500 deployment.
- For any natural gas turbine O&M USA or EPC engagement, USP&E combines the scale of a major EPC with the agility and ownership culture of a founder-led firm.
Ready to Power Your Project? Talk to USP&E’s Engineers — Free.
USP&E Global offers a complimentary 4-hour engineering consultation for qualified power station, EPC, and O&M projects. Whether you are in early feasibility or ready to mobilize, our team of 350+ engineers across 35+ countries is ready to guide your project to success — with speed and without excuses.
Quick Links:
- Contact USP&E by clicking on this link.
- Request a fast equipment quote
Global Resources
- USP&E's Project Experience Portfolio
- USP&E Case Studies and Client Reference Letters
- USP&E Integrity and Compliance policy
- USP&E's ISO Certifications and Credentials

