Who Builds Power Plants in Conflict Zones? The Complete EPC Guide

Who builds power plants in conflict zones? It is one of the most important and least answered questions in global energy procurement. When a country is rebuilding after armed conflict, when a mine is operating in an active war zone, or when a utility needs emergency power capacity in a region that most EPC contractors refuse to enter, the pool of qualified, compliant, and capable contractors shrinks dramatically. USP&E Global has been answering that question with boots on the ground, ISO-certified engineering, and zero lawsuits since 1999. This guide explains what it takes to build power plants in conflict zones, which contractors actually do it, and how to structure an EPC project safely and compliantly when the project site is in a fragile, post-conflict, or active-conflict environment.

 

Why Most EPC Contractors Refuse Conflict Zone Power Projects

The global EPC market is large, but the number of contractors willing and able to deliver power plant EPC in conflict zones is small. The reasons are consistent across the industry.

 

Risk and insurance constraints: Standard contractor liability insurance does not cover active conflict zones. Most EPC firms cannot obtain or afford the specialist war-risk and political risk coverage required to mobilise personnel and equipment into regions designated as conflict-affected by international insurers.

Compliance complexity: Projects in conflict-adjacent or post-conflict countries require careful OFAC screening, FCPA compliance, and in some cases formal licences from the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. Contractors without dedicated compliance infrastructure routinely walk away from opportunities in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, and Yemen rather than navigate this process.

Supply chain disruption: Procurement of balance-of-plant components, transformers, switchgear, and civil materials is significantly more complex when import routes are restricted, ports are damaged, or in-country logistics providers are unavailable. Standard procurement timelines double or triple.

Personnel safety and HSE requirements: ISO 45001:2018-certified Health, Safety and Environment frameworks are mandatory for responsible contractors. Implementing these frameworks in a conflict environment requires specialist planning, local knowledge, and experienced security coordination that most EPC firms simply do not have.

 

These are not insurmountable challenges. They are qualification criteria. They filter out the contractors who are not prepared and leave a small, specialist cohort who have invested in the systems, relationships, and experience required to deliver. USP&E Global is one of those contractors.

 

The Profile of a Qualified Conflict Zone EPC Power Contractor

Not every company that claims to build power plants in conflict zones actually has the credentials, experience, and systems to do so safely and compliantly. The following criteria define a genuinely qualified conflict zone EPC contractor.

 

Table 1: Qualification Criteria for Conflict Zone EPC Power Plant Contractors

Qualification Criterion	Why It Matters in Conflict Zones	USP&E Global Status
ISO 9001:2015 Certification	Guarantees documented quality management across hostile supply chains	Certified. Current.
ISO 45001:2018 Certification	Mandatory HSE standard for personnel operating in hazardous environments	Certified. Current.
OFAC and FCPA Compliance Infrastructure	Required for US-linked entities operating in sanctioned-adjacent regions	Full compliance programme. Zero violations.
Conflict Zone Track Record	Proof of prior delivery in active or post-conflict environments	Mali, Iraq, Ukraine, Togo, Liberia, South Africa, Syria feasibility studies.
In-Country Staffing Capability	Ability to source and manage local engineers and security logistics	400+ employees, offices in 7 countries.
War-Risk Insurance Access	Coverage for equipment, personnel, and project liability	Specialist coverage in place for active projects.
Zero Lawsuit History	Indicator of ethical, transparent contracting practices	Zero lawsuits in 25 years.

 

 

Section 3: Conflict Zones Where USP&E Has Delivered Power Plant EPC and O&M

USP&E Global has operated in conflict-affected, post-conflict, and high-risk frontier markets across four continents. The company’s position is clear: USP&E builds power plants where the energy need is greatest, provided the project is OFAC-compliant and the funding is verified. This includes environments that most global EPC firms classify as no-go zones. Below is a summary of key regions where USP&E has delivered power plant EPC in conflict zones or immediately post-conflict conditions.

 

Mali: Active Mining Operations in a Conflict-Adjacent Environment

Mali has experienced significant political instability since 2012, including military coups, jihadist insurgencies in the north and centre of the country, and the withdrawal of Western military forces in 2023. Despite this, USP&E Global currently employs more than 120 engineers and technicians in Mali, operating HFO and diesel power stations for major mining clients including Barrick Gold, Resolute Mining, Leo Lithium, GangFeng, and Firefinch. These are active contracts with measurable uptime performance guarantees. The Ministry of Mines and Strategic Resources of Mali governs the sector under which USP&E’s clients operate.

 

Ukraine: Emergency Power Infrastructure During Active Conflict

Since the Russian invasion of February 2022, Ukraine’s power grid has been systematically targeted. USP&E Global has been actively engaged in Ukraine’s emergency power restoration, supplying and deploying gas turbine and diesel generating equipment under the oversight of DTEK, Ukraine’s largest private energy company, and supporting grid operators aligned with Ukrenergo, the Ukrainian transmission system operator. Ukraine is one of USP&E’s highest-priority active conflict zone power plant EPC engagements.

 

Iraq: Post-War EPC and O&M for Grid Reconstruction

Iraq’s power sector suffered decades of infrastructure damage through the Gulf War, the 2003 invasion, and the ISIS conflict from 2014 to 2017. USP&E has quoted and engaged extensively in Iraq, working with Iraqi utility clients and international project developers to supply gas turbines, provide EPC services, and structure O&M programmes for reconstructed facilities. The Iraqi Ministry of Electricity administers power sector development under frameworks aligned with World Bank and IFC financing.

 

Syria: Feasibility and Reconstruction Planning Post-Conflict

Syria presents one of the most complex conflict zone power procurement environments in the world. USP&E Global operates in Syria under OFAC guidance, which permits certain energy sector activities subject to licence. USP&E has conducted feasibility studies for power station sites in Syria and maintains active relationships with project developers in Doha and the Gulf region coordinating Syrian reconstruction projects. The US Department of the Treasury OFAC Syria sanctions framework governs what activities are permissible. USP&E’s compliance team manages this process for qualified projects.

 

Liberia and Sierra Leone: Post-Civil War Energy Infrastructure

Both Liberia and Sierra Leone experienced devastating civil wars that destroyed energy infrastructure entirely. USP&E has designed, built, and operated diesel and HFO power stations across both countries since 2009, serving mining clients including London Mining, Gerald Group, SL Mining, and resort and hospitality operators in Freetown. The Liberia Electricity Corporation and Sierra Leone’s Ministry of Energy and Water Resources govern power sector development in these post-conflict economies.

 

Togo and Burkina Faso: Power in Sahel Security Transition Zones

The Sahel security corridor from Burkina Faso through northern Togo has experienced significant insecurity since 2020, with multiple coup governments and active terrorist activity in northern regions. USP&E currently operates over 50 MW of gas turbine power in Togo and has completed power station work in Burkina Faso for clients including West African Resources and Perkoa Copper. These are live, operational contracts, not just historical references.

 

The Compliance Framework for Power Plant EPC in Conflict Zones

Building a power plant in a conflict zone is not just an engineering challenge. It is a compliance challenge. Any EPC contractor that does not have a rigorous, documented compliance programme is a liability to its clients, not an asset. The following framework governs how USP&E approaches every conflict zone power plant EPC engagement.

 

Table 2: Compliance and Due Diligence Framework for Conflict Zone EPC Power Projects

Compliance Requirement	Description and Application	Governing Body or Standard
OFAC Screening	All counterparties, site coordinates, and end buyers screened against US Treasury sanctions lists before contract execution	US Department of the Treasury, OFAC
FCPA Compliance	Zero tolerance for payments to government officials or politically connected individuals. No commissions that cannot be documented and disclosed.	US Department of Justice, FCPA enforcement
KYC and Passport Verification	Copies of passports for all key individuals in the transaction chain required before proceeding to term sheet stage	FATF AML/CFT Standards
Proof of Funds Verification	Independent bank confirmation or financier letter required before full engineering resource is deployed to any project	Internal USP&E commercial policy
NDA and Non-Circumvention Agreement	All parties sign before asset locations or detailed technical information is disclosed. Protects owners and clients alike.	USP&E standard NDA template
ISO 45001:2018 HSE Plan	Site-specific HSE plans prepared for every conflict zone deployment, including emergency evacuation, medical protocols, and security coordination	ISO 45001:2018
ISO 9001:2015 QMS	Quality Management System documentation covers all procurement, engineering deliverables, and commissioning milestones on conflict zone projects	ISO 9001:2015

 

 

USP&E’s compliance approach is non-negotiable. Clients who cannot disclose project location, cannot confirm the identity of the end buyer, or who represent politically connected individuals are politely but firmly declined. This policy has protected USP&E’s clean record across 150+ projects and 35+ countries over 25 years. For a detailed overview of USP&E’s integrity framework, see the USP&E Integrity, Compliance and Ethics page.

 

Fast-Track Power Delivery for Conflict Zone Projects

Emergency power delivery in conflict zones requires speed without sacrificing quality or compliance. USP&E’s inventory of over 3,000 MW across new, used, and surplus gas turbines and engine-driven generating sets means that equipment lead times do not have to be the bottleneck on a conflict zone power project.

 

For conflict zone clients requiring fast-track power solutions, USP&E’s GE TM2500 mobile gas turbines are among the most deployable large-scale generation assets in the world. The TM2500 can deliver up to 35 MW per unit, is containerised for air, sea, or road transport, and can achieve first power within 90 days of contract signature in accessible locations. This has made the TM2500 the gas turbine of choice for Ukraine, Iraq, and West African emergency power deployments.

 

For mining clients operating in conflict zones, USP&E’s hybrid power systems combining solar, diesel, battery storage, and gas provide a resilient, fuel-cost-optimised generation platform. The SmartPower AI platform provides remote monitoring and predictive maintenance for all generating assets, which is particularly valuable in environments where on-site engineering resources must be minimised for security reasons.

 

For conflict zone HFO projects, clients should understand that HFO power station installation is never a fast-track process regardless of conflict conditions. Engineering and design requires 4 to 12 weeks with a paid engineering deposit. Balance-of-plant procurement requires 3 to 6 months. Civil works require 3 to 6 weeks on prepared sites. Assembly, pipefitting, and mechanical and electrical connections require 4 to 8 months depending on plant scale. Commissioning requires 2 to 4 weeks. Total project timelines for HFO in conflict zone environments typically run 14 to 20 months from signed contract.

Financing Power Plant EPC Projects in Conflict Zones

The most common reason conflict zone power projects stall is not security, not logistics, and not engineering. It is financing. Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) including the World Bank Group, the African Development Bank, the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) all have specific programmes for energy infrastructure in fragile and conflict-affected states. Projects that can achieve DFI financing reach a far higher probability of execution than those relying solely on private or sovereign capital.

 

USP&E Global works with project developers navigating DFI financing processes to structure EPC and O&M commercial frameworks that are bankable under World Bank and IFC requirements. This includes preparing conceptual feasibility studies, engineering cost estimates, and O&M programme designs that satisfy the technical due diligence requirements of multilateral lenders.

 

USP&E’s standard process for conflict zone projects with DFI financing involvement begins with a conceptual feasibility study, typically priced at USD 150,000 to USD 200,000 for a standard site evaluation with two or three technology option comparisons. Full bankable feasibility studies with detailed engineering cost estimates are priced from USD 430,000. For more information on engineering services, see USP&E Power Plant Engineering and the USP&E EPC Construction services page.

 

Frequently Asked Questions About Power Plant EPC in Conflict Zones

Who builds power plants in conflict zones and what qualifies them to do it?

Only a small number of EPC contractors globally have the combination of ISO certification, OFAC compliance infrastructure, in-country staffing, specialist insurance coverage, and verified conflict zone track record required to deliver power plant EPC in conflict zones safely and compliantly. USP&E Global is one of fewer than a dozen firms globally that meets all of these criteria. Qualification requires proof of prior delivery in conflict-affected environments, not just a willingness to operate there. USP&E has active contracts in Mali, Ukraine, Togo, and Liberia, all of which qualify as conflict-affected or high-security-risk environments.

 

Can a power plant be built in an active war zone?

Yes, under the right conditions. Active war zone power projects require site selection away from direct conflict lines, specialist HSE planning, security coordination with local authorities or private providers, war-risk insurance for equipment and personnel, and OFAC compliance verification for sanctioned-adjacent regions. USP&E has delivered power station equipment and O&M services in Ukraine during active conflict, and in Mali during ongoing Sahel security operations. The key is not to avoid risk entirely but to manage, document, and insure it correctly.

 

How long does it take to build a power plant in a post-conflict country?

Fast-track gas turbine deployments in post-conflict environments can achieve first power in as little as 60 to 90 days when containerised equipment is available and site access is unobstructed. Standard diesel generator installations for mining or industrial clients run 30 to 60 days for smaller units under 20 MW. Full HFO or gas power station EPC projects in post-conflict countries typically require 14 to 24 months from signed contract to commissioning due to civil works, balance-of-plant procurement, and engineering design requirements specific to each site.

 

What is OFAC and why does it matter for conflict zone power projects?

OFAC is the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. It administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security goals. For power plant EPC contractors with US shareholders, US-based staff, or USD-denominated transactions, OFAC compliance is mandatory. Projects in or near sanctioned countries such as Iran, Russia, North Korea, or certain areas of Syria require OFAC screening and in some cases a specific OFAC licence before work can commence. USP&E has a full OFAC compliance programme and declines all projects where sanctions compliance cannot be verified.

 

Does USP&E build power plants in Syria?

USP&E Global operates in Syria under OFAC guidance for energy sector activities permitted by US sanctions regulations. USP&E has conducted feasibility studies in Syria and maintains active project development relationships with Gulf-based reconstruction partners. All Syria projects require an OFAC licence review process before contracts are signed. USP&E works closely with legal counsel and compliance advisors to navigate this process for qualified clients with verified project funding and legitimate energy development objectives.

 

How do I fund a power plant project in a conflict zone or post-conflict country?

The most effective funding pathways for conflict zone and post-conflict power projects are Development Finance Institution (DFI) facilities provided by the World Bank IDA and IBRD programmes, the African Development Bank, the IFC, the US International Development Finance Corporation, and the European Investment Bank. Private equity and IPP structures are also viable where power purchase agreement (PPA) counterparties can be secured with government backing. USP&E can assist qualified project developers in structuring bankable feasibility documentation aligned with DFI requirements.

 

What fuel types are available for power plants in conflict zones where supply chains are disrupted?

Diesel is the most logistics-flexible fuel for conflict zone power projects because it can be transported in road tankers, drums, or bladder tanks without pipeline or gas infrastructure. Diesel generators from Caterpillar, Cummins, MAN, and Wartsila are the most common solution for emergency and fast-track conflict zone power. Natural gas turbines including the GE TM2500 are viable where local gas supply exists or where LNG supply chains can be established. HFO is the lowest-cost fuel per kilowatt-hour for large installations above 20 MW but requires significant balance-of-plant infrastructure and is never appropriate for fast-track conflict zone deployments.

 

Summary. Key Takeaways for Who Builds Power Plants in Conflict Zones

This article addresses the critical procurement question of who builds power plants in conflict zones and what qualifies them to do it. Key takeaways for decision-makers:

 

• Who builds power plants in conflict zones: fewer than a dozen globally qualified EPC contractors meet the full criteria of ISO certification, OFAC compliance, in-country staffing, specialist insurance, and conflict zone delivery track record.
• USP&E Global has active power plant EPC and O&M contracts in Mali, Ukraine, Togo, and Liberia, all of which are conflict-affected or high-security-risk environments.
• OFAC and FCPA compliance are non-negotiable requirements for any legitimate conflict zone EPC engagement. Projects in sanctioned-adjacent regions including Syria require a formal OFAC licence review before contracts are signed.
• Fast-track gas turbine solutions including the GE TM2500 can achieve first power in 60 to 90 days in accessible conflict zone locations. HFO projects in the same environments require 14 to 24 months minimum.
• DFI financing through the World Bank, IFC, AfDB, and US DFC is the most reliable funding pathway for power plant EPC in conflict zones and post-conflict reconstruction environments.
• USP&E’s 25-year zero-lawsuit record, ISO certifications, 400+ engineers, and 150+ completed projects across 35+ countries distinguish it as the authority EPC contractor for who builds power plants in conflict zones globally.

 

Ready to Power Your Conflict Zone or Post-War Project? Talk to USP&E’s Engineers. Free. USP&E Global offers a complimentary 4-hour engineering consultation for qualified power station, EPC, and O&M projects. Whether your project is in early feasibility, requires urgent fast-track delivery, or is operating in a conflict-affected or post-war environment, our team of 400+ engineers across 35+ countries is ready to guide your project to success with speed and without excuses. USP&E Global  |  Powering Possibility. Built for the Frontier. ISO 9001:2015  |  ISO 45001:2018  |  150+ Projects  |  35+ Countries  |  Zero Lawsuits

 

Quick Links:

• Contact USP&E by clicking on this link.
• Request a fast equipment quote

Global Resources

• USP&E's Project Experience Portfolio
• USP&E Case Studies and Client Reference Letters
• USP&E Integrity and Compliance policy
• USP&E's ISO Certifications and Credentials